The BALCONY Bulletin

 
 
Finding  Common Ground Between
New York Business
and Labor
  
 
March 26, 2009
 
 
 BALCONY Endorses an Increase in
the Income Tax Rate on the Wealthy

 BALCONY MEMBERS DISCUSS INCOME TAX
AT ALBANY & NYC MEETINGS
BALCONY ENDORSES AN INCREASE IN THE TAX RATE ON THE WEALTHY

 
GOTHAM RESEARCH POLL SHOWS 73% SUPPORT HIGHER TAX OF NYS EARNERS OVER $500,000

March 26, 2009 -- The Business and Labor Coalition of New York, BALCONY, www.balconynewyork.com, today called for a New York State income tax increase on the wealthy as a means to help close the $16.4 billion New York State budget gap for 2009-10.  Raising the state income tax at the high end is the best choice to balance the ballooning state budget.  This was the conclusion reached by BALCONY, a coalition of over one thousand businesses, labor unions, and advocacy groups, after two membership meetings in Albany and New York City in the last two days.
 
Fiscal Policy Institute Chief Economist James Parrott gave a presentation to the BALCONY members in New York on Wednesday, March 25th, following presentations in Albany on Tuesday by Ronald Deutsch, Executive Director of New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness and Frank Mauro, Executive Director of the Fiscal Policy Institute.  BALCONY issued a nine-point proposal on the progressive tax, which is shown on the right).


 
View the complete presentation: Presentation

At the same time, BALCONY released a new Gotham Research Group poll which shows that a vast majority of New York State voters, 73%, support increasing the state income tax for those who earn more than $500,000 per year in order to help solve the current New York State fiscal crisis.  Even when the target population for the tax increase is expanded to those who earn more than $250,000 per year, the measure is still approved by 65% of voters.
 
 "Voters are not persuaded by the argument that higher earners already pay their fair share in taxes," said pollster Jeffrey Levine, who surveyed a representative sample of 400 New York voters from March 20 through 22, 2009.  "73 per cent of New Yorkers across the state, from all partisan backgrounds, believe that those who make more should pay more this year in order to address New York's fiscal crisis."



View the complete presentation: Gotham
Read: Gotham Survey Release

BALCONY believes that raising taxes modestly on New York taxpayers with $500,000 or more of taxable income in conjunction with cost cutting and improved efficiency can solve our budget deficit.
 
 "BALCONY has carefully considered suggestions from its diverse business and labor membership, as well as many citizens from New York State and leading economists to develop its position on solving our state's severe budget deficit.  We believe that modestly increasing taxes on our state's high-end income earners (which should not have a significant impact on their families) in conjunction with sensible cost cutting and improvements in efficiencies can solve our state's budget deficit, and keep New York healthy and competitive," asserted Bruce Ventimiglia, BALCONY's business Co-Chairman, and Chairman of Saratoga Capital Management.
 
Alan Lubin, BALCONY labor Co-Chairman and Executive Vice President of NYSUT  added,  "BALCONY has long understood that raising new revenue would have to be part of the solution to our worsening economic situation, just as we recognize that prudent state spending is necessary. A New York State Progressive Income Tax increase that will raise at approximately $5 billion is a step in the right direction. It is hoped that these two actions, coupled with the quick investment of federal stimulus monies will help spur the economic recovery and growth needed to provide essential services and a brighter future for all New Yorkers."
 
New York State faces a $16.4 billion budget deficit this fiscal year, and is under a constitutional obligation to balance its budget.  Approximately $7 billion of the state's 2009 -10 budget deficit will be offset by funds from the federal government stimulus program, leaving a shortfall of $9.4 billion.  This deficit was not caused by wasteful spending, but instead was created by the harsh economic downturn that confronts both our state and our country.  Tragically, Wall Street finds itself in the eye of this economic hurricane, greatly diminishing the nearly 20% of New York State's revenue that the financial industry has in recent years produced. 
 
"This is not just the old saw that state spending is out of control," emphasized Parrott. "Spending has risen because important new commitments to make school aid more equitable and to expand Medicaid coverage have been authorized."
 
Parrott stated that there are only two meaningful alternatives to balance our state's budget: economic growth or sensible increased taxation.  Unfortunately, economic growth is not a viable alternative for the foreseeable future, leaving increased taxation as the only solution, as unpalatable as this may be to some.  Parrott also cited statements by Nobel Economics Laureate Joseph Stiglitz and White House Budget Director Peter Orszag to the effect that this was the least damaging of the choices facing states in balancing their budgets.
 
BALCONY will continue to examine the New York State taxing and budget issues as it receives more input from its diverse membership.

Hypothetical
Graduated Rate Options
 
 

March 24, 2009 Albany Meeting

 
Higher income tax on wealthy New Yorkers offers sensible solution in recessionary times.

State lawmakers must find a way to increase revenue without causing further harm to the troubled economy as they work to resolve New York's $14 billion budget deficit. That was the message conveyed to BALCONY members Tuesday in a special presentation by Ronald Deutsch, Executive Director of New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness and Frank Mauro, Executive Director of the Fiscal Policy Institute. The March 24 meeting took place at the The Desmond Hotel and Conference Center in Albany with more than 20 people attending.

BALCONY Co-Chairman Alan Lubin, Executive Vice President of NYSUT said the purpose of Tuesday's session was to bring the issue to the forefront and find a fiscal solution that makes sense.  "By putting these facts out there and getting people to weigh in we can make something happen," Lubin said. "This would be a boom to New York if we could get this through - great for the state and great for New York's businesses."
 
Mauro explained that New York's budget deficit did not occur overnight, and unlike popular opinion, was not due to out of control spending or overly ambitious tax cuts. In fact, state spending in areas other than health, education, STAR and transportation grew by less than 3% a year from 2004 to 2008, he explained. New and unfunded commitments, the Wall Street meltdown and catastrophic decline in the economy have all helped create New York's current budget deficit.
 
"The Federal Government does what it can to try and stimulate the economy, but cutting taxes and increased spending," Mauro explained "The states have balanced budget requirements and only have undesirable options. In this case, New York's Legislators have to choose the least bad alternative.  A Progressive Tax is preferable over a Consumption Tax. Laying off low wage and middle income workers is not the solution."
 
The pair suggested that an increased income tax on the state's wealthiest residents augmented by spending cuts and sensible revenue raisers is one way to bridge the deficit while causing the least economic harm. Since 2003, New York's income growth has been concentrated among the top five percent of the earners while the system itself has flattened. He cited the fact that New York's personal income tax rate (6.85% in 2006) is at a historical low when compared to neighboring Connecticut (5.0%) and New Jersey (8.97%). Changes to the tax system would not force upper class New Yorker's out of the state nor bring about dire economic effects that were predicted when the Legislature adopted a temporary three-year income tax increase on upper income taxpayers in 2003.
 
Deutsch presented three possible scenarios to help close the budget gap using a combination of increased taxes for New York's wealthiest residents, spending cuts and other sensible revenue raisers that could raise conservatively $8.6 to $9.8 billion. The tax proposal offer graduated rate options that would impact New Yorkers making $200,000 or more.
 
Support for this type of plan has been strong in most cases, Lubin said.  "Wealthy New Yorkers want to be part of the solution. We need to ensure that people have disposable income in this economy so they can go out and spend and provide the stimulation that this economy so desperately needs."
 
 
BALCONY AT WORK
FOR NEW YORK
 
 
BALCONY Co-Chairmen
 

                     

              Bruce Ventimiglia                            Alan Lubin
                   Chariman,                               Executive VP,
      Saratoga Capital Management                     NYSUT
       
Call, Write or Email BALCONY
 BALCONY
633 Third Avenue, 16th Floor 
New York, NY 10017
212-219-7777

www.balconynewyork.com
 
Contact: Lou Gordon - BALCONY Director

 
BALCONY, the Business and Labor Coalition of New York, represents more than 1,000 New York businesses, labor unions, and trade associations. BALCONY seeks common ground in the public policy debate in New York to spur economic development through the adoption of business/union friendly, socially responsible common sense laws that maintain and improve the quality of life for working New Yorkers.

Open this e-Mail in Browser

 

 Click Here: Income Tax
 
e-mail broadcast produced by Kevin R. Weaver

WHY BALCONY SUPPORTS
A HIGHER INCOME TAX
ON NEW YORK'S WEALTHY
AS A MEANS TO SOLVE
NEW YORK STATE'S
$16.4 BILLION BUDGET  

  • New York State faces a $16.4 billion budget deficit, yet it is under a constitutional obligation to balance its budget. 
  • Approximately $7 billion of our budget deficit will be offset by funds from the Federal government, leaving a shortfall of $9.4 billion.
  • New York State's budget deficit was not caused by wasteful spending, but rather it was created by the harsh economic downturn that both our state and our country are confronted with.  Tragically, Wall Street finds itself in the eye of the current economic hurricane, greatly diminishing the approximately 20% of New York State's revenue that it has produced in recent years. 


    (click image to view full presentation)

  • There are only two meaningful alternatives to meeting our constitutional obligation to balance our state's budget that will not impair our economy: economic growth and/or sensible increased taxation (while cutting costs needs to be part of any fair plan, if costs are cut too deeply our economy could be crippled for years to come). 

    Unfortunately, economic growth is not a viable alternative for the foreseeable future, leaving increasing taxation in a sensible, targeted manner, as our only solution, as unpalatable as increasing taxes may be to some.
  • Prominent economists, such as Joseph Stiglitz, Peter Orszag and others, suggest that the least harmful way to extricate New York State from its budget crisis is to raise the taxes on high-end income earners.  This was done for the three-year period from 2003-2005 when the highest state income tax rate went from 6.85% to 7.7% for people earning over $500,000, and predicted negative effects did not occur (taxes were also increased for taxpayers with incomes above $150,000). Furthermore, Messrs. Stiglitz and Orszag noted, "Reductions in government spending on goods and services, or reductions in transfer payments to lower-income families, are likely to be more damaging to the economy in the short run."
  • It is BALCONY's belief that raising taxes modestly on New York's citizens with $500,000 or more of taxable income, in conjunction with cost cutting and improvements in the efficiency regarding how our state delivers its services, can solve our budget deficit.
  • BALCONY thanks all of the $500,000 plus wage earners in New York who are already paying a large portion of our state's income taxes.  It is BALCONY's belief that increasing taxes for this component of our population will not significantly impact their lives while it will go a long way toward solving our budget deficit.
  • The majority of New York State voters (73%) support increasing the state income tax for those who earn more than $500,000 a year.  This finding is from a recent poll conducted by Jeffrey Levine of the Gotham Research Group.
  • BALCONY also believes that expansion of the circuit breaker as a way to provide real property tax relief is much needed.

__________________

Celebrate a Memory by
Giving Hope to Others 

 

Your secure tax-deductible donation will remember a loved one and immediately support lifesaving cancer research, education, advocacy, and patient service programs.

 
(click here for details)
 
__________________________________
 

BALCONY Members Directory
Spring 2009
 


 

 
Our new eBook presents the
BALCONY Members Directory
in an exciting format!

 
Take the Virtual Tour!

 
Click on the image
to access the directory.
 
_________________________________
 
 
Discounted Subscription for BALCONY members and friends to the Empire Page -- the ultimate source for news about NYS government & politics, click here: Empire Page.